From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jrwbt-0006o8-DS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:51:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jrwbo-0006gy-Rv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:51:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36313 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jrwbn-0006gp-Vs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:51:36 -0400
Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([194.106.48.114])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rpurdie@rpsys.net>) id 1Jrwbm-0000lf-HV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 10:51:35 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m42EpTN6025257
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 2 May 2008 15:51:29 +0100
Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP id 25188-02 for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;
	Fri,  2 May 2008 15:51:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dax.rpnet.com [192.168.1.3])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m42EpKdK025251
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 2 May 2008 15:51:20 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu and mmap_min_addr
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
In-Reply-To: <481874A7.7000704@hut.fi>
References: <48185B4D.4060903@hut.fi>
	<200804301331.32869.paul@codesourcery.com>  <481874A7.7000704@hut.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:51:19 +0100
Message-Id: <1209739879.5184.16.camel@dax.rpnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 16:31 +0300, Jussi Hakala wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> > You have to use a nonzero GUEST_BASE to offset the guest VM.  However this 
> > hasn't been tested in a while, and has probably bitrotted.
> 
> For preliminary testing, setting GUEST_BASE to 65536 seemed to work. 
> I'll investigate further and report back to you :)

I was also looking at this problem and setting GUEST_BASE seemed to fix
my test cases although I've not tried it in a wider environment.

I was wondering if mismatching the host and guest memory layouts like
that incurred a performance penalty though?

Regards,

Richard