From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JweA6-0005WN-Aj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 10:10:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JweA4-0005UR-Ah for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 10:10:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37551 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JweA3-0005UL-Rx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 10:10:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35927) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JweA3-0003AS-BU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 10:10:23 -0400 From: Glauber Costa Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 11:09:20 -0300 Message-Id: <12108605731805-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/13] New shot at QEMUAccel Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi guys, This is a new version of the QEMUAccel work. To start with, I decided to keep the name for now. We don't have that many functions that are not cpu-related to justify splitting the structure into many. Plus, this is one of the less confusing names we came up with. The code I'm posting is tested with kqemu for both i386 and x86_64, and it works. So, if you guys feel like it, I can say it's ready for inclusion (which obviously does not mean bug-free). It is not complete, however. There are still some pieces of kqemu code that does not work. Specially the interrupt code in cpu-exec.c , which relies on the tricky longjmp. Comments are very welcome.