From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KH1bZ-00062s-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:15:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KH1bX-0005yP-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:15:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36144 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KH1bX-0005y8-9p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:14:59 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:36580) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KH1bW-0001rA-Qo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:14:59 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6AJErK8003186 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:14:53 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6AJEVlZ029248 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:14:45 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6AJEUmv007059 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:14:31 -0600 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Add HPET emulation to qemu From: Beth Kon In-Reply-To: <20080710091801.GA4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1215661726.9862.33.camel@beth-ubuntu> <20080710091801.GA4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:14:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1215717240.25598.1.camel@beth-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: agraf@suse.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Cool! > Does it now happen that qemu no longer wakes up every 10ms? If not, > please try to make sure it happens, that would eventually fix that power > leak :) > > Samuel > I will look into CONFIG_NO_HZ operation next. Haven't tried that yet. > -- Elizabeth Kon (Beth) IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: eak@us.ibm.com