From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L10jU-0004B8-N9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:37:16 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L10jT-0004AU-Lg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:37:16 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41407 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L10jT-0004AM-HG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:37:15 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37577)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1L10jT-0004ek-FA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:37:15 -0500
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <491C8467.6040104@codemonkey.ws>
References: <> <1226594763-2304-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1226594763-2304-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1226594763-2304-3-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1226594763-2304-4-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1226594763-2304-5-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<491C8467.6040104@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:36:02 +0000
Message-Id: <1226676962.9332.76.camel@blaa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/5] Add new cpu_names() function
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 13:47 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Add a new function, cpu_names(), which lists the available
> > CPU names for the target.
> 
> Can we get rid of cpu_list and replace it with cpu_names() printed to 
> stdout?

Yep, I'd much rather that ... but ppc and sparc list more than just the
name ...

Cheers,
Mark.