From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBIJH-0003Lv-GL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:24:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBIJF-0003KJ-L5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:24:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38950 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBIJF-0003K7-F7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:24:41 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:41834) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBIJE-0007kU-Ot for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:24:41 -0500 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBD0N997009650 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:23:09 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mBD0OdKE209758 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:24:39 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mBD0OcXo027332 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:24:39 -0700 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] kvm: sync vcpu state during initialization From: Hollis Blanchard In-Reply-To: <1229127797.3347.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1229028752-9480-1-git-send-email-hollisb@us.ibm.com> <494184F5.9080406@codemonkey.ws> <1229127797.3347.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:24:38 -0600 Message-Id: <1229127878.3347.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:23 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > When I use "-cpu coreduo" (for some strange reason "core2duo" is not > recognized), I don't segfault. I didn't have TARGET_X86_64, so that explains the missing core2duo... -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center