From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSaYB-0001Nn-3B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:19:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSaY9-0001ME-7x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:19:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51480 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSaY9-0001Lu-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:19:33 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53014) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSaY8-0007qY-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:19:32 -0500 From: Glauber Costa Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:19:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1233249569-16686-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Improve cpuid x86 code. Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com Hey, This is a resend of the cpuid patches, following Anthony's last suggestion. It proved to lead to a much better code IMHO. I'm also using the existing host_cpuid function to mask out features, but now relying on kvm's provided ioctl. This seem to provide the expected behavior.