From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUL2N-0005FY-0l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:09:59 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUL2K-0005DV-T1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:09:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33248 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUL2K-0005Cr-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:09:56 -0500 Received: from pelvoux.gotadsl.co.uk ([81.6.248.91]:50287) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUL2K-0004t2-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:09:56 -0500 Received: from fozzy by ecrins.fosdick.home.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUL2X-0002eE-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:10:09 +0000 From: Steve Fosdick Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:10:08 +0000 Message-Id: <1233666609.5644.12.camel@ecrins.fosdick.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Qemu-devel] VM stops responding, 100% CPU, switching to monitor fails Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I am currently experiencing an issue where the guest VM stops responding, attempting to switch to the monitor does not do anything either and the host CPU usage shows as 100% system. So far the only solution I have found is to kill the qemu process. A normal SIGTERM signal seems to be sufficient. This is with kernel 2.6.28.2, kqmeu 1.3.0~pre11 and qemu 0.9.1. Do you have any tips on what I can do to get to the bottom of this? I am thinking as the CPU usage is all system time that there maybe an infinite loop running within kqemu though I would not know if the loop was in code that is part of kqemu itself or the guest OS. If the guest had got stuck in an infinite loop though I would have hoped the monitor would still work. Regards, Steve.