From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@raisama.net>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] vmdk: check for negative sector nums also
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:56:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235080301-sup-7932@blackpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499DD2C8.1050606@mail.berlios.de>
Excerpts from Stefan Weil's message of Qui Fev 19 18:44:40 -0300 2009:
> Eduardo Habkost schrieb:
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block-vmdk.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block-vmdk.c b/block-vmdk.c
> > index 71d7504..416fb95 100644
> > --- a/block-vmdk.c
> > +++ b/block-vmdk.c
> > @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int vmdk_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> >
>
> Why is sector_num signed? An unsigned quantity would simplify the code below
> (no need to check for < 0).
It's part of the block device interface:
int (*bdrv_write)(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
const uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors);
Changing it would require changing every other block driver. Shall we do
that?
>
> > uint64_t cluster_offset;
> > static int cid_update = 0;
> >
> > - if (sector_num > bs->total_sectors) {
> > + if (sector_num < 0 || sector_num > bs->total_sectors) {
> > fprintf(stderr,
> > "(VMDK) Wrong offset: sector_num=0x%" PRIx64
> > " total_sectors=0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> >
>
> Regards
> Stefan Weil
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 21:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] CVE-2008-0928 security fix Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 21:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] vmdk: check for negative sector nums also Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 21:44 ` Stefan Weil
2009-02-19 21:56 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2009-02-19 21:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] hw/sd.c: remove ununsed SECTOR_SIZE define Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 21:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] Move SECTOR_BITS/SECTOR_SIZE to block.h Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 21:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Fix CVE-2008-0928 - insufficient block device address range checking Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 21:40 ` Eduardo Habkost
2009-02-19 22:21 ` Aurelien Jarno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235080301-sup-7932@blackpad \
--to=ehabkost@raisama.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weil@mail.berlios.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).