From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeGeH-00036n-LO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:30:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeGeF-00034h-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:30:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40202 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeGeF-00034X-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:30:07 -0500 Received: from soufre.accelance.net ([213.162.48.15]:51331) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeGeF-0003hg-AK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:30:07 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (potipota.net [88.168.176.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by soufre.accelance.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13AC450A6 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:30:03 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sh : performance problem From: Lionel Landwerlin In-Reply-To: <49AA25BF.3070707@juno.dti.ne.jp> References: <49A6C317.1080202@juno.dti.ne.jp> <1235848518.7364.2.camel@coalu.atr> <49AA25BF.3070707@juno.dti.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:30:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1236033035.4975.1.camel@coalu.atr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 =C3=A0 15:05 +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI a =C3=A9= crit : > Hi, Lionel. > Thank you for the response! >=20 > Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > Le vendredi 27 f=C3=A9vrier 2009 =C3=A0 01:28 +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWA= SAKI a > > =C3=A9crit : > >=20 > > Hi Shin-ichiro, > >=20 > > I'm interested by your patch, but it does not apply on top of the r62= 15 > > (qemu svn) + qemu-sh patches > > ( http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dvirt/qemu/lethal/qemu-sh.git;a=3Dsummary= )=20 > >=20 > > Should I try on the last qemu svn ? >=20 > Yes. When I send patch to qemu-devel ml, I make diff against > qemu main repository. Could you try on it? >=20 >=20 Are you working on a 32 or 64bits host system ? I experiencing a lot of random behavior with qemu... >>From now I don't a have video anymore... --=20 Lionel Landwerlin