From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sh : performance problem
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:11:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236121899.4005.17.camel@coalu.atr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49AD50E2.7000401@juno.dti.ne.jp>
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009 à 00:46 +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI a écrit :
> Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > Shin-ichiro,
> >
> > Sorry, but I cannot apply your patch cleanly on the last qemu-svn.
> >
> > Instead, I would like to try another approach. The patch you proposed to
> > find (or not) a valid TLB entry has a complexity of O(log2(n)) (or
> > something like that if I remember) instead here is a patch with a
> > complexity of O(1).
>
> Good work. I evaluated your patch on my environment, measuring
> compile time for empty main() with gcc.
>
> sh4 : 5.8 [seconds] O(n) utlb search.
> sh4 : 4.6 [seconds] O(log2(n)) utlb search.
> sh4 : 4.1 [seconds] O(1) utlb search by Lionel
> arm : 0.8 [seconds] (-M versatilepb + Debian ARM)
>
> Your patch has a nice score!
>
> Now I've done the work to increase number of utlb entries from 64 to 256,
> and found that the score get arround 2.4 seconds.
> I'm trying to increase it to 4096. Your O(1) search will be more important
> as the entry number increase.
We should setup a git repository to improve that or at least work on the
same basis.
Do you have a lot of patch on top of the last svn ?
--
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 16:28 [Qemu-devel] sh : performance problem Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-02-28 19:15 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-01 6:05 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-01 12:46 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-01 16:10 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-01 17:39 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-02 14:46 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-02 22:30 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-03 15:32 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-02 23:58 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-03 0:09 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-03 15:46 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-03 18:57 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-03 19:25 ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-03-03 22:28 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-03-04 2:59 ` Paul Brook
2009-03-04 15:22 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-04 15:39 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-03-03 23:11 ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]
2009-03-04 15:12 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236121899.4005.17.camel@coalu.atr \
--to=lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).