qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, libvirt-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] docs: Update preferred NBD device syntax
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:50:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238dfef-a3e1-4b07-5dd4-6e925d98196f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904081809.GB19582@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1567 bytes --]

On 9/4/19 3:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:

>>>>> -Syntax for specifying a NBD device using TCP
>>>>> +Syntax for specifying a NBD device using TCP, in preferred URI form:
>>>>> +``nbd://<server-ip>[:<port>]/[<export>]''
>>>>> +

>>>>>  ``nbd:<server-ip>:<port>[:exportname=<export>]''
>>>>>

> 
> In general libvirt should never use the psuedo-URI/URI syntax for
> anything. We're moving towards use of blockdev, so will have the
> dot separated key syntax on the cli and equiv in QMP.

There's a difference between '-drive' (which sort of implies the
file=URI... syntax) and '-blockdev + -device' (where you use the
dot-separated syntax).  Yes, we should document and encourage the use of
-blockdev even more (at which point URIs are not needed, whether or not
they are the preferred URI or the old form); but as long as -drive can
only take a non-dotted representation, we should still be choosing the
non-dotted representation that is at least reusable among other projects
that also use URI syntax for NBD drives.

> 
> I hope this means we'll stop using the URIs in migration, but will
> defer to peter for specifics.
> 
> I always think it is a shame that QEMU has done so much work on
> blockdev, but all QEMU's docs still largely use the many legacy
> syntaxes. IOW, we should make these NBD examples use the modern
> non-URI syntax too.

Agreed, but that is separate patches to this one.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 14:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: Update preferred NBD device syntax Eric Blake
2019-09-03 18:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-09-03 19:02   ` Eric Blake
2019-09-03 19:06     ` John Snow
2019-09-04  8:18       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-09-04 12:50         ` Eric Blake [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238dfef-a3e1-4b07-5dd4-6e925d98196f@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=libvirt-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).