qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Wheeler <bdwheele@indiana.edu>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/2] qemu: switch pci device init functions to accept devfn
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:47:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239630459.27750.3.camel@nibbler.dlib.indiana.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090413133021.GA1065@amt.cnet>

On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:30 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:27:34PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Monday 13 April 2009, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Some pci device initialization functions do not accept a devfn parameter,
> > > but instead use "-1", which caused pci_register_device to find the first
> > > free slot on the given bus.
> > >
> > > Have them accept a "devfn" parameter, and use the newly introduced
> > > pci_bus_assign_dev_addr function on platform init code to perform
> > > the "first free" enumeration.
> > 
> > I don't see how this is better. If anything we want the platform code to get 
> > smaller, not larger.
> 
> Paul,
> 
> This is a intermediate step. Later you'd get rid of
> pci_bus_assign_dev_addr in platform code.
> 
> Ideally you'd have (I think):
> 
> - generic machine initialization code fills in details of pci device
>   address in pci device structure (or a temporary placeholder) taken from
>   machine description (optionally auto assigns from a free slot).

> - pci driver init functions take generic device pointer as an
>   argument (either containing the pre allocated pci device or temporary
>   placeholder), and pass that to pci_register_device, which does
>   actual registration of pci device on particular bus.
> 
> Does that make sense?
> 
> A benefit of the proposed patch is that it moves assumptions about pci  
> device address assignment from drivers up to platform code. Later you'd
> remove that from platform code to devtree data.
> 

Does this mean that there would be a mechanism for a platform to map the
pci memory address to a platform specific linear address?  Alpha uses 

0x8000000000 + (0x20000000 * bus) + address

to determine where the pci memory is mapped in the cpu address space...


Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-13 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-13  3:53 [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/2] RFC: move PCI device enumeration out of pci drivers Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-13  3:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 1/2] qemu: move pci devfn "first free" assignment to separate function Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-13  8:08   ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-13  3:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/2] qemu: switch pci device init functions to accept devfn Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-13 12:27   ` Paul Brook
2009-04-13 13:30     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-13 13:47       ` Brian Wheeler [this message]
2009-04-13 14:34         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-14  3:29           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-14  8:17     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1239630459.27750.3.camel@nibbler.dlib.indiana.edu \
    --to=bdwheele@indiana.edu \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).