From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lu8hh-0004eg-9P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:15:17 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lu8hc-0004e5-JI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:15:16 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36437 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lu8hc-0004e2-FO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:15:12 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35322)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1Lu8hb-0005uL-HS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:15:12 -0400
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <49E5EB90.7000603@siemens.com>
References: <20090414172954.15035.73053.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net>
	<20090414172954.15035.35711.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net>
	<1239800979.4431.128.camel@blaa> <1239802857.4431.139.camel@blaa>
	<49E5EB90.7000603@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:15:06 +0100
Message-Id: <1239815706.4431.159.camel@blaa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/7] net: Add VLAN client cleanup handler
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 16:13 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

> Ah, good, there it is. Is it considered ready for inclusion, also into
> stable? Then I would start rebasing my patches and give feedback if I
> happen to find quirks.

Thanks, I'd greatly appreciate you giving it a bash.

As for pushing to stable - it's a fairly big patch, with the potential
to introduce crashers. I'd be wary of applying it to stable, but I guess
it all depends on how cautious we're being about stable.

Cheers,
Mark.