qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Added IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP/IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP flags to setsockopt
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:08:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241046530.19973.2.camel@coalu.atr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429203552.GB20993@shareable.org>

Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 21:35 +0100, Jamie Lokier a écrit :
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:05:06PM +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > > Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 10:21 -0700, Nathan Froyd a écrit :
> > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:30:19PM +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > > > > linux-user: Added IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP/IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP flags to setsockopt
> > 
> > > > Should these be TARGET_IP_* instead, or are they like the FUTEX_*
> > > > constants and the same on every platform?  If the latter, at the very
> > > > least there should be explanatory comments somewhere--just making them
> > > > TARGET_IP_* would be even better, IMHO.
> > 
> > > I'm agree too, I just did the way it was before...
> > 
> > These are defined in include/linux/in.h so they should be same on all archs?
> 
> But what if you're compiling for a non-Linux host?
> 
> IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP/IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP are standard BSD sockets options,
> found everywhere, even on Windows I think.

Ok, so I think I can keep the patch as it is now

-- 
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-25 21:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Added IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP/IP_DROP_MEMBERSHIP flags to setsockopt Lionel Landwerlin
2009-04-27 17:21 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-04-27 18:05   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2009-04-29 18:00     ` Riku Voipio
2009-04-29 20:35       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-29 20:43         ` Riku Voipio
2009-04-29 21:00           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-29 21:41             ` Riku Voipio
2009-04-30  2:41               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-29 23:08         ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1241046530.19973.2.camel@coalu.atr \
    --to=lionel.landwerlin@openwide.fr \
    --cc=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).