From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3uBK-0001J3-G9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 11:46:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3uBH-0001IY-2h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 11:46:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52810 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3uBG-0001IT-Ql
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 11:46:10 -0400
Received: from smtp-out0.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.175]:39576)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <pebolle@tiscali.nl>) id 1M3uBG-0001zH-3r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 11:46:10 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] EHCI emulation module for review
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1295ed070905120601s4c3c94e8g5e198b6b7a993636@mail.gmail.com>
References: <o4ikg45ccdvu5ttfpb1nhfi9ub9ekhu89t@4ax.com>
	<1240874133.28148.62.camel@x41.thuisdomein>
	<1242120767.7568.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1295ed070905120536n50ace3fdx9903034ab339159a@mail.gmail.com>
	<1242132812.2106.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1295ed070905120601s4c3c94e8g5e198b6b7a993636@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:06 +0200
Message-Id: <1242143166.2106.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Burkley <qemu@emutex.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:01 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> > If you still have trouble to get it to work against the current master
> > branch (or do not feel like manually correcting the patch) I could post
> > what worked for me (where worked means: at least doesn't segfault
> > immediately, but will run into issues sooner or later ...).
> 
> The problem could be that we have different definitions of "working".
> [...]
>
> Did you get it to run all the way to devices working normally?

No, as I said, I run into issues sooner or later (even after finally
discovering the IRQ problem for Linux guests I mentioned in an earlier
message).

I haven't yet tried to pinpoint the source of those issues (and, without
feedback on the - sometimes serious - problems I already reported, I'm
not sure whether it's worth the effort to actually do that).


Paul Bolle