From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M4FwQ-0000Nh-Fn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 11:00:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M4FwM-0000N6-U9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 11:00:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37709 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M4FwM-0000N3-ON
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 11:00:14 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40127)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1M4FwM-0003CF-6y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 11:00:14 -0400
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1242225826-15384-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
References: <1242225826-15384-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:00:10 +0100
Message-Id: <1242226810.27745.13.camel@blaa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Fix regression in load_linux for
	stable
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 09:43 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Instead of just applying Mark's fix, I've reverted the original broken backport,
> cherry picked the original patch, included Mark's backport fix, and committed
> the result.
> 
> This gives us one commit in stable that can be cherry picked that is regression
> free.  I did this to make things easier for packagers.

Sounds like a fine plan to me.

Thanks,
Mark.