From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>,
ajax@redhat.com, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:42:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243446153.4852.9.camel@blaa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1D4C57.6010109@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> We need a mechanism to toggle this for both this and virtio-blk. The
> reason a toggle is needed is so that 0.11 can create the same device
> model as 0.10.
Okay, so the scenario is:
- 0.10 guest running on source machine
- migrate to dest machine running 0.11
- the device model cannot change or the guest OS will get confused
How about running qemu on the dest machine with -model-version=0.10 ?
At least that way it's something the management system can easily figure
out (i.e. source is running in qemu 0.10, rather than source qemu is
using class=XXX).
Nasty thing about it is that the distributions couldn't cherry-pick
changes like this because they'd deviate from the device model contract
for a given upstream version.
Could we not put this stuff in savevm and change the device model
post-init?
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-27 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 17:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-24 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-27 17:42 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2009-05-27 22:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 9:33 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 9:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 12:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 12:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 21:45 ` Dor Laor
2009-05-29 9:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-29 9:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-29 9:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-29 10:09 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:47 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 13:08 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 13:39 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:35 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-28 13:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-28 13:20 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243446153.4852.9.camel@blaa \
--to=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).