From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MG87o-0008KF-Ab for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:05:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MG87i-0008Jy-Jv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:05:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46483 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MG87i-0008Jv-DJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:05:02 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:42401) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MG87h-00034p-OZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:05:02 -0400 Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] From: Mark McLoughlin In-Reply-To: <20090614093411.GA6959@redhat.com> References: <20090610145540.GI19375@poweredge.glommer> <20090610150129.GC28601@redhat.com> <200906101624.30659.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090610174301.GC7416@shareable.org> <20090610182227.GN28601@redhat.com> <20090610192702.GH7416@shareable.org> <1244796209.16425.20.camel@blaa> <4A326C7E.3020309@codemonkey.ws> <1244822007.30522.68.camel@blaa> <20090614093411.GA6959@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:02:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1245056533.6891.18.camel@blaa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Carsten Otte , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Blue Swirl , Christian Borntraeger , Paul Brook , Avi Kivity On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:34 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 04:53:27PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > The other obvious piece to add to it would be PCI addresses, so that > > even if you remove a device, the addresses assigned to existing devices > > don't change. > > Could you clarify this requirement please? Avi clarified, but I've written it up here too: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_Stable_PCI_Addresses Cheers, Mark.