From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHLJ1-0006V4-Rw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:21:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHLIx-0006Oe-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:21:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43807 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHLIw-0006O2-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:21:38 -0400 Received: from mail01.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net ([159.134.118.17]:34732) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHLIw-0008SU-3u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:21:38 -0400 From: Mark McLoughlin Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:21:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1245345696-20915-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] TUNSETSNDBUF - pushback to help UDP tx List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, The first two patches are a fix to fix a potential crash with host_net_remove while doing heavy network I/O. The rest of the patches add support for using the new TUNSETSNDBUF ioctl in 2.6.30 in order to provide some pushback against UDP applications in the guest who are sending packets faster than the host can handle them. More detail in the 06/08 patch. Cheers, Mark.