From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHv4x-0002bl-08
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:33:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHv4t-0002Z4-5Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:33:34 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53278 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHv4s-0002Yy-Th
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:33:30 -0400
Received: from mailgw3.cms.com ([202.75.200.223]:41292 helo=cms.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <vibi_sreenivasan@cms.com>) id 1MHv4r-0005kj-4n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:33:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/12] fix qemu_alloc/qemu_free for
	linux-user subsystem
From: vibi sreenivasan <vibi_sreenivasan@cms.com>
In-Reply-To: <200906192040.59253.jcd@tribudubois.net>
References: <y> <1245358219-13170-5-git-send-email-jcd@tribudubois.net>
	<1245408639.11443.13.camel@system>
	<200906192040.59253.jcd@tribudubois.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:31:04 +0530
Message-Id: <1245481265.2064.10.camel@system>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-Message-Id: <E1MHv4t-0002Z4-5Q@lists.gnu.org>
Reply-To: vibi_sreenivasan@cms.com
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


HELLO Jean,
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 20:40 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote:
> Hello Vibi,
> 
> Le vendredi 19 juin 2009 12:50:39 vibi sreenivasan, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 22:50 +0200, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> > > From: Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@jcd-laptop.(none)>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
> > > ---
> > >  linux-user/main.c    |   10 +++++-----
> > >  linux-user/syscall.c |   16 ++++++++--------
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > I can see an alternate implementation for
> > qemu_malloc & other related functions in linux-user/mmap.c
> 
> This is true. It sounds that the various xxx-user subsystems are not using the 
> main qemu_malloc.c implementation.
> 
> But this is just a fact ... I am not sure how I should interpret your comment.
> 
since various xxx-user subsystems are not using the main qemu_malloc.c
implementation , your changes would be having  a different effect than
intended.

Thanks & Regards
Vibi Sreenivasan
> JC
> 
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Vibi Sreenivasan
> 
> 
>