From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MTXm6-0007qh-5d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:06:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MTXm1-0007pJ-9I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:06:09 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42108 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTXm1-0007pD-29
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:06:05 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50582)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1MTXm0-0004cV-GA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:06:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Remove the pc-0-10 machine type
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A66D451.3040706@redhat.com>
References: <1247128775.22231.15.camel@blaa>
	<1248186119-17111-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1248187781.7126.3.camel@blaa> <4A6675FD.8080402@codemonkey.ws>
	<4A66D451.3040706@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:05:36 +0100
Message-Id: <1248253536.2867.43.camel@blaa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:56 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/22/09 04:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:21 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >>> We have the pc-0.10 machine type now which does exactly the same
> >>> thing.
> >>
> >> Ah, I see Gerd fixed this already.
> >>
> >> My other three patches should apply on top of his.
> >
> > Three or two? Can you take a closer look?
> 
> Isn't going to work.  I'd suggest to kick out my patch and take Mark's 
> complete series instead.  It does all my patch did, cleans up a bit more 
> in virtio-pci.c (leading to conflicts) and adds the aliasing.

Heh :-)

Either way is fine - the only difference between with Gerd's patch with
the two I just posted and the original four is a small cleanup in
virtio-pci.c

Cheers,
Mark.