From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjIWR-0005Kq-8e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:03:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjIWM-0005G9-Cs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:03:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51495 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MjIWM-0005Fp-90 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:03:02 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:55909) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjIWK-0007AI-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:03:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjIWF-0001Jz-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:02:55 -0400 From: Mark McLoughlin In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:01:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1252008114.3084.136.camel@blaa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back to non-accelerated mode Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dustin Kirkland Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back > to non-accelerated mode > > We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm. It > looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late > in vl.c. This patch moves the kvm initialization a bit higher in the > vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults. > We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha. Please apply > upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution. Ah discussion about an alternative fix for this fizzled out recently: http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg19890.html Cheers, Mark.