From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtP2g-0002tB-Kb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:02:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtP2c-0002mL-5c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:02:10 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52030 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtP2b-0002lr-Kr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:02:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57667)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1MtP2b-0003F0-5O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:02:05 -0400
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AC4DDA7.9070708@redhat.com>
References: <1241459088.26045.1.camel@lappy>
	<1241513785-28738-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
	<1254257151.29022.11.camel@blaa> <20090930135144.GA29956@infradead.org>
	<4AC36355.8040908@redhat.com> <1254319160.3105.67.camel@blaa>
	<4AC4DDA7.9070708@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:00:26 +0100
Message-Id: <1254416426.2920.41.camel@blaa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] qemu-kvm: virtio-net: Re-instate GSO
 code removed upstream
Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:49 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 03:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > I think we should keep the vlan stuff, just de-emphasise it.
> >    
> 
> Maybe we should do what X.org does, break it silently and remove it some 
> time later when no one complains.

Well, the 'silently' part isn't going to work now, is it?

Anyway, I'm sure at least Jan would notice if his 'dump' backend stopped
working

Cheers,
Mark.