From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mxjlu-0008EM-Uk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:46 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mxjlq-0008DH-Iw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:46 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53835 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxjlq-0008DE-DD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:42 -0400
Received: from smtp-out3.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.178]:47218)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <pebolle@tiscali.nl>) id 1Mxjlp-0001Nx-Kz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:41 -0400
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
In-Reply-To: <m3aazv1jox.fsf@neno.mitica>
References: <1255426327.1817.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<m3tyy336d2.fsf@neno.mitica>
	<1255432955.1817.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<m3aazv1jox.fsf@neno.mitica>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:58:38 +0200
Message-Id: <1255449518.1679.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix *-user build error
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:56 +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:01 +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > Why doesn't "make clean" do what one expects it to do? Can't it be made
> > to behave properly?
> 
> Not trivial.
> foo-softmmu/config.h got renamed foo-softmmu/config-target.h
> now a new config.h got created at toplevel directory, that includes
> config-target.h (and more things, that is the whore reason why it was
> created).
> 
> Adding removal of foo-softmmu/config.h to the Makefile is an option, but
> this is a "once" affair, i.e. it is only needed if you have ever
> compiled in that directory.  Both options are bad:
> - add a removal of foo-softmmu/config.h that is not generated at all
> - require users to removal config.h once
> 
> 2nd one was adopted, both have disadvantages, just different ones.
> The other option was to rename config.h to something different, but that
> was a BIIIIIIIG patch for no gain either :(

I see. All that basically happened was that this rename etc. took place
in a repository in which I had previously built qemu and I should not
run into this issue anymore. Thanks.


Paul