From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N10sh-0006DK-2d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:19 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N10sZ-00063j-07
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54102 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N10sY-00063I-LV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:10 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35724)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <markmc@redhat.com>) id 1N10sX-00041w-Ro
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:10 -0400
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9MGp9pb012454
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:09 -0400
Received: from blaa.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.9.1])
	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id n9MGp89p009516
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:51:08 -0400
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:49:01 +0100
Message-Id: <1256230156-29652-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] Some networking code re-organization
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hey,
        We've been meaning to split net.c up for quite a while now,
so here goes with a first cut at.

        There shouldn't be anything too controversial here, apart
from CONFIG_LINUX maybe.

        I've build tested this on F11, F12 and mingw and also done
some basic runtime testing.

        Building on e.g. *BSD, Solaris and AIX hasn't been tested.
I wouldn't be surprised if I've broken the build there despite all
my efforts but, if I have, it should be trivial to fix back up.

        This isn't the end of the cleanups; obviously the other
backends could be split out too, we could use module construtors, etc.

Cheers,
Mark.