From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZpX-000191-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:23:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZpT-000137-6r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:23:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50651 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZpS-000134-VD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:23:07 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:33710) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7ZpS-0003dX-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:23:06 -0500 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nA9JEsJN008138 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:14:54 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nA9JN4Iu1490950 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:23:04 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nA99Ku48018184 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:20:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] virtio: Report new guest memory statistics pertinent to memory ballooning (V2) From: Adam Litke In-Reply-To: <20091109190144.GB3808@shareable.org> References: <1257782838.2835.5.camel@aglitke> <20091109190144.GB3808@shareable.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:23:03 -0600 Message-ID: <1257794583.2835.27.camel@aglitke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 19:01 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > These days, would it make more sense to emit a QJSON object? > > In this case the JSON object is quite human readable too. I'm not very particular on the output format since it's main consumer is likely another program. Is XML output via the monitor a new precedent in qemu? I was unable to find any other monitor command that emits XML. -- Thanks, Adam