From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFuFk-0003Ae-2D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:48:40 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFuFf-00034r-3b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:48:39 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43306 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFuFe-000342-MZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:48:34 -0500
Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:3751)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@hp.com>) id 1NFuFe-0007Sv-BO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:48:34 -0500
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3pr6xcjjm.fsf@neno.neno>
References: <cover.1259754426.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<3c7c499f0a21f08a0f5d5f1496cb3180e5a179b7.1259754427.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<20091202145430.GG18519@redhat.com>  <m3pr6xcjjm.fsf@neno.neno>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:48:58 -0700
Message-ID: <1259779738.9257.1.camel@8530w.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 31/41] virtio-net: we know macs size at
 compile time, make it static
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: markmc@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:33 +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > No objection to this or similar change with vlans,
> > but I'd like to know why was this made a separate buffer
> > originally.
> 
> Dunno, either, but I think that this has been always that way.
> 
> commit b6503ed9b8815ecfb82fe9faba28936365321248  was when it was introduced
> 
> Alex, any objection?

No objection.  I'd guess it may have been left over from earlier
versions when I was thinking the guest could specify a MAC filter table
size.

Alex