From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSqL9-00029X-E8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:15:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSqL4-00027C-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:15:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38465 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSqL4-00026z-1F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:15:38 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49165) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSqL3-0006IB-DH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:15:37 -0500 From: Stefan Weil Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:15:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1262862925-5205-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <4B45C209.1030802@mail.berlios.de> References: <4B45C209.1030802@mail.berlios.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: Fix initial value for PCI_STATUS List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: mst@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, qemu-devel@nongnu.org The numerical value was wrong (0x2800 instead of 0x0280) which indeed did not make sense. Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil --- hw/eepro100.c | 4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c index 336ca49..a21c984 100644 --- a/hw/eepro100.c +++ b/hw/eepro100.c @@ -420,10 +420,8 @@ static void pci_reset(EEPRO100State * s) /* TODO: this is the default, do not override. */ PCI_CONFIG_16(PCI_COMMAND, 0x0000); /* PCI Status */ - /* TODO: this seems to make no sense. */ /* TODO: Value at RST# should be 0. */ - PCI_CONFIG_16(PCI_STATUS, - PCI_STATUS_REC_MASTER_ABORT | PCI_STATUS_SIG_TARGET_ABORT); + PCI_CONFIG_16(PCI_STATUS, PCI_STATUS_DEVSEL_MEDIUM | PCI_STATUS_FAST_BACK); /* PCI Revision ID */ PCI_CONFIG_8(PCI_REVISION_ID, 0x08); /* TODO: this is the default, do not override. */ -- 1.6.5