From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nrw4W-00080b-A0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:26:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43642 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nrw4V-0007w3-O9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:26:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <pebolle@tiscali.nl>) id 1Nrvt7-0002G7-VT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:14:31 -0400
Received: from smtp-out0.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.175]:43572)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <pebolle@tiscali.nl>) id 1Nrvt7-0002F2-Hz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:14:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb-linux: remove unreachable
	default in switch statement
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4BA0FC66.6080307@codemonkey.ws>
References: <1268053115.2130.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<4BA0FC66.6080307@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:14:15 +0100
Message-ID: <1268842456.2231.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle<pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> >    
> Applied.  Thanks.

Paul Brook was "tempted to replace it by an abort()" (about one and a
half week ago). Did you perhaps miss that message or weren't you tempted
to do this?

Regards,


Paul Bolle