From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42287 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdXnc-0004cC-HO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:13:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@redhat.com>) id 1OdXna-0006zs-W4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:13:36 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44326)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@redhat.com>) id 1OdXna-0006zd-PF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:13:34 -0400
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C4E1A33.7050709@codemonkey.ws>
References: <20100726212849.GB2651@x200.localdomain>
	<4C4E0C05.5030004@codemonkey.ws>  <4C4E1A33.7050709@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:13:28 -0600
Message-ID: <1280189608.4601.237.camel@x201>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for July 27
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 18:28 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 05:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 07/26/2010 04:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
> > - 0.13 update
> >   I'll pre-empt the 0.13 question with an answer.  I'm just testing 
> > the VNC changes and if all goes well, I'll tag tonight.
> >
> >   Initial thinking is to keep 0.14 short and target Dec 1st.
> >
> > - if danpb can make it, would like to discuss -help output parsing
> >   summary: help parsing is terrible, but given the fact that 
> > capabilities is going to take a while to get totally right, would like 
> > to discuss an interim solution that gives us more flexibility to do 
> > reasonable things with the help output.
> 
> - any additional input on probed_raw?

 - cpu model #s, does anyone know things that would break if we bumped
the qemu64 model up to 13 (or higher?) and made definitions for
Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem use more representative model #s?