From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] pci: Store capability offsets in PCIDevice
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:49:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289792963.2805.146.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101113210541.GB23361@redhat.com>
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 23:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:47:21AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > This not only makes pci_find_capability a directly lookup, but also
> > allows us to better track added capabilities and avoids the proliferation
> > of random additional capability offset markers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>
> There shouldn't be any need to store offsets
> separately as find_capability gives you the value,
> and duplicating same data in two places is bad
> as we need to keep them in sync now.
>
> We track offset to msi and msix capabilities as an optimization:
> because they are used on data path. I can't see why would
> we need to optimize any other capability like this.
That's what I figured. I'm not going to fight for this one, but I do
like the consistency of accessing all capabilities directly instead of
having a few that are more equal than the rest. Can the benefit of
having msix_cap or msi_cap even be measured? In my casual observations
with device assignment, those registers don't get touched enough to
warrant a special case either. We've got a lot bigger problems if we
can't keep a couple tables in sync between an add and delete call.
Thanks,
Alex
> > ---
> >
> > hw/msix.c | 15 +++++++--------
> > hw/pci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > hw/pci.h | 5 +++--
> > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
> > index b98b34a..060f27b 100644
> > --- a/hw/msix.c
> > +++ b/hw/msix.c
> > @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ static int msix_add_config(struct PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned short nentries,
> > pci_set_long(config + MSIX_PBA_OFFSET, (bar_size + MSIX_PAGE_PENDING) |
> > bar_nr);
> > }
> > - pdev->msix_cap = config_offset;
> > /* Make flags bit writeable. */
> > pdev->wmask[config_offset + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] |= MSIX_ENABLE_MASK |
> > MSIX_MASKALL_MASK;
> > @@ -253,7 +252,8 @@ static void msix_clr_pending(PCIDevice *dev, int vector)
> >
> > static int msix_function_masked(PCIDevice *dev)
> > {
> > - return dev->config[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] & MSIX_MASKALL_MASK;
> > + return dev->config[dev->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX] +
> > + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] & MSIX_MASKALL_MASK;
> > }
> >
> > static int msix_is_masked(PCIDevice *dev, int vector)
> > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void msix_handle_mask_update(PCIDevice *dev, int vector)
> > void msix_write_config(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t addr,
> > uint32_t val, int len)
> > {
> > - unsigned enable_pos = dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET;
> > + unsigned enable_pos = dev->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX] + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET;
> > int vector;
> >
> > if (!range_covers_byte(addr, len, enable_pos)) {
> > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static CPUReadMemoryFunc * const msix_mmio_read[] = {
> > void msix_mmio_map(PCIDevice *d, int region_num,
> > pcibus_t addr, pcibus_t size, int type)
> > {
> > - uint8_t *config = d->config + d->msix_cap;
> > + uint8_t *config = d->config + d->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX];
> > uint32_t table = pci_get_long(config + MSIX_TABLE_OFFSET);
> > uint32_t offset = table & ~(MSIX_PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> > /* TODO: for assigned devices, we'll want to make it possible to map
> > @@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ int msix_uninit(PCIDevice *dev)
> > if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX))
> > return 0;
> > pci_del_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX, MSIX_CAP_LENGTH);
> > - dev->msix_cap = 0;
> > msix_free_irq_entries(dev);
> > dev->msix_entries_nr = 0;
> > cpu_unregister_io_memory(dev->msix_mmio_index);
> > @@ -493,7 +492,7 @@ int msix_present(PCIDevice *dev)
> > int msix_enabled(PCIDevice *dev)
> > {
> > return (dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX) &&
> > - (dev->config[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] &
> > + (dev->config[dev->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX] + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] &
> > MSIX_ENABLE_MASK);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -534,8 +533,8 @@ void msix_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
> > if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX))
> > return;
> > msix_free_irq_entries(dev);
> > - dev->config[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] &=
> > - ~dev->wmask[dev->msix_cap + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET];
> > + dev->config[dev->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX] + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET] &=
> > + ~dev->wmask[dev->caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX] + MSIX_CONTROL_OFFSET];
> > memset(dev->msix_table_page, 0, MSIX_PAGE_SIZE);
> > msix_mask_all(dev, dev->msix_entries_nr);
> > }
> > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > index bc25be7..773afa5 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > @@ -1990,15 +1990,24 @@ int pci_add_capability_at_offset(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id,
> > {
> > uint8_t i, *config = pdev->config + offset;
> >
> > + /* Check overlap with existing capabilities, valid cap, already added */
> > for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> > if (pdev->config_map[offset + i]) {
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (!cap_id || cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX) {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pdev->caps[cap_id]) {
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > config[PCI_CAP_LIST_ID] = cap_id;
> > config[PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT] = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST];
> > - pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST] = offset;
> > + pdev->caps[cap_id] = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST] = offset;
> > memset(pdev->config_map + offset, cap_id, size);
> > /* Make capability read-only by default */
> > memset(pdev->wmask + offset, 0, size);
> > @@ -2033,6 +2042,7 @@ void pci_del_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id, uint8_t size)
> > /* Clear cmask as device-specific registers can't be checked */
> > memset(pdev->cmask + offset, 0, size);
> > memset(pdev->config_map + offset, 0, size);
> > + pdev->caps[cap_id] = 0;
> >
> > if (!pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST]) {
> > pdev->config[PCI_STATUS] &= ~PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST;
> > @@ -2041,7 +2051,13 @@ void pci_del_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id, uint8_t size)
> >
> > uint8_t pci_find_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id)
> > {
> > - return pci_find_capability_list(pdev, cap_id, NULL);
> > + if (cap_id == PCI_CAP_ID_BASIC) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + if (cap_id && cap_id <= PCI_CAP_ID_MAX) {
> > + return pdev->caps[cap_id];
> > + }
> > + return 0xff;
> > }
> >
> > static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon, DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > diff --git a/hw/pci.h b/hw/pci.h
> > index cea1c3a..b4c19ba 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci.h
> > +++ b/hw/pci.h
> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ typedef struct PCIIORegion {
> > #define PCI_NUM_PINS 4 /* A-D */
> >
> > #define PCI_CAP_ID_BASIC 0xff
> > +#define PCI_CAP_ID_MAX PCI_CAP_ID_AF
> >
> > /* Bits in cap_present field. */
> > enum {
> > @@ -170,8 +171,8 @@ struct PCIDevice {
> > /* Capability bits */
> > uint32_t cap_present;
> >
> > - /* Offset of MSI-X capability in config space */
> > - uint8_t msix_cap;
> > + /* Offset capabilities in config space */
> > + uint8_t caps[PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1];
> >
> > /* MSI-X entries */
> > int msix_entries_nr;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 17:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] PCI capability and device assignment improvements Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/9] pci: pci_default_cap_write_config ignores wmask Alex Williamson
2010-11-13 21:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-16 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/9] pci: Remove pci_enable_capability_support() Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] device-assignment: Use PCI capabilities support Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/9] pci: Replace used bitmap with capability byte map Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] pci: Remove cap.length, cap.start, cap.supported Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/9] device-assignment: Move PCI capabilities to match physical hardware Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/9] pci: Pass ID for capability read/write handlers Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/9] pci: Remove capability read/write config handlers Alex Williamson
2010-11-12 17:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 9/9] pci: Store capability offsets in PCIDevice Alex Williamson
2010-11-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-15 3:49 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289792963.2805.146.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).