From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38945 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLXoO-0002EV-4U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:08:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1PLXoI-0005ra-25
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:08:15 -0500
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:56891)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1PLXoH-0005rW-O8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:08:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] scsi-generic: bugfixes for
	'SCSIRequest' conversion
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CEE2724.6000801@suse.de>
References: <1290586723-8724-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org>
	<4CECD36E.50401@suse.de> <4CECD50F.9060501@redhat.com>
	<4CECE609.7080600@suse.de> <4CECEA2A.40008@redhat.com>
	<4CECED12.5020109@suse.de> <1290674774.32570.106.camel@pasglop>
	<4CEE2343.3090505@redhat.com> <1290675704.32570.114.camel@pasglop>
	<4CEE2724.6000801@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:07:58 +1100
Message-ID: <1290676078.32570.115.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com

On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 10:06 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> No, this is exactly as I'm expecting the SCSI layer to work.
> So from the light of this the patch to scsi-generic is valid.
> And it really looks like papering over a bug in the lsi HBA code.

Ok. I have no special case tho for a complete() coming for data with 0
in arg. I will just skip the DMA part and call read/write again until I
get SCSI_REASON_DONE.

Cheers,
Ben.