From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57484 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PSbXX-0004OK-64
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:32:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1PSbXU-0002Ql-DJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:32:01 -0500
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36096)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1PSbXU-0002QQ-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:32:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv8 00/16] boot order specification
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <E5C0F98B-5799-423D-A87D-A33E9A6809ED@web.de>
References: <1291808109-22563-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTi=-uEELKjvUz5Uu2w3=dqUj+DXXpTmhsN5zB2-Z@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101211160617.GA9026@redhat.com> <1292109723.16694.392.camel@pasglop>
	<E5C0F98B-5799-423D-A87D-A33E9A6809ED@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:31:44 +1100
Message-ID: <1292358704.16694.411.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, kevin@koconnor.net, Alexander Graf <alex@csgraf.de>, The@gnu.org, OpenBIOS Mailinglist <openbios@openbios.org>


> The only working system emulation we have are Macs (G3 beige, G4, G5),  
> so we can't just ignore Apple.
> Alex even made me stick to their odd 0x41 rtas-version property. ;)

Hah :-) Nothing ever used RTAS on these... afaik, it didn't even work
properly.

> No, but that may be OpenBIOS' fault. Here's its reg, in case it helps:
> 
> reg                       00001800 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000000
>                           01001810 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000008
>                           01001814 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000004
>                           01001818 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000008
>                           0100181c 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000004
>                           01001820 00000000 00000000   00000000 00000010
> 

That looks like PCI.... odd to keep a PCI addressing scheme below a PCI
device...

Cheers,
Ben.