qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/2] qdev: Track runtime machine modifications
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:51:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294840314.3214.131.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hbdeuxvl.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:09 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Create a trivial interface to track whether the machine has been
> > modified since boot.  Adding or removing devices will trigger this
> > to return true.  An example usage scenario for such an interface is
> > the rtl8139 driver which includes a cpu_register_io_memory() value
> > in it's migration stream.  For the majority of migrations, where
> > no hotplug has occured in the machine, this works correctly.  Once
> > the machine is modified, we can use this interface to detect that
> > and include a subsection for the device to prevent migrations to
> > rtl8139 versions with this bug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  hw/qdev.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  hw/qdev.h |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/qdev.c b/hw/qdev.c
> > index 6fc9b02..e450c21 100644
> > --- a/hw/qdev.c
> > +++ b/hw/qdev.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> >  #include "blockdev.h"
> >  
> >  static int qdev_hotplug = 0;
> > +static bool qdev_hot_added = false;
> > +static bool qdev_hot_removed = false;
> >  
> >  /* This is a nasty hack to allow passing a NULL bus to qdev_create.  */
> >  static BusState *main_system_bus;
> > @@ -93,6 +95,7 @@ static DeviceState *qdev_create_from_info(BusState *bus, DeviceInfo *info)
> >      if (qdev_hotplug) {
> >          assert(bus->allow_hotplug);
> >          dev->hotplugged = 1;
> > +        qdev_hot_added = true;
> >      }
> >      dev->instance_id_alias = -1;
> >      dev->state = DEV_STATE_CREATED;
> > @@ -294,6 +297,8 @@ int qdev_unplug(DeviceState *dev)
> >      }
> >      assert(dev->info->unplug != NULL);
> >  
> > +    qdev_hot_removed = true;
> > +
> >      return dev->info->unplug(dev);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -394,6 +399,11 @@ void qdev_machine_creation_done(void)
> >      qdev_hotplug = 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool qdev_machine_modified(void)
> > +{
> > +    return qdev_hot_added || qdev_hot_removed;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Get a character (serial) device interface.  */
> >  CharDriverState *qdev_init_chardev(DeviceState *dev)
> >  {
> 
> Why do you track add/remove separately, in qdev_hot_added and
> qdev_hot_removed?  I don't mind, just curious.

I thought the distinction might be useful at some point, but we don't
use it yet.  Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-12 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix rtl8139 migration with hotplug Alex Williamson
2010-12-16 18:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qdev: Track runtime machine modifications Alex Williamson
2010-12-16 18:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] rtl8139: Use subsection to restrict migration after hotplug Alex Williamson
2010-12-16 23:41 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix rtl8139 migration with hotplug Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-12-17  1:35 ` Juan Quintela
2011-01-04 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH " Alex Williamson
2011-01-04 19:37   ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/2] qdev: Track runtime machine modifications Alex Williamson
2011-01-12 12:09     ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-12 13:51       ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2011-01-04 19:38   ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 2/2] rtl8139: Use subsection to restrict migration after hotplug Alex Williamson
2011-01-05 10:13   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Fix rtl8139 migration with hotplug Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1294840314.3214.131.camel@x201 \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).