From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3vDB-0004Cy-4S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 12:52:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3vD5-0004Aj-4e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 12:52:11 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46163 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3vD4-0004AT-PN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 12:52:06 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:47184)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <pktoss@gmail.com>) id 1M3vD4-0001TG-6u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 12:52:06 -0400
Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so87629fxm.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1242122779.22141.108.camel@chianamo>
References: <1242027306.22141.38.camel@chianamo>
	<1295ed070905120133j4a147071g8f685d5db0903ef2@mail.gmail.com>
	<1242122779.22141.108.camel@chianamo>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:52:04 +0300
Message-ID: <1295ed070905120952m54f7bcc0y8a8416602b1b9bbf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] usb_linux_update_endp_table: Broken pipe
From: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net>

> Not being a qemu or Linux developer I probably shouldn't comment, but
> the -staging tree for dumping stuff to be merged seems to work well for
> Linux so maybe qemu could do the same.

I 'm not a qemu developer either. I 'm just interested in seeing these problems
fixed eventually.

> Yeah, it is an all-in-one scanner-printer-fax. One of the interfaces is
> the printer, one the scanner and not sure about the other one.

Fwiw, I 'd guess the 3rd interface is a HID one for the scanner button.
lsusb -v can tell you for sure.

> I was using qemu 0.10.3 when I had these issues, how recent is max's work? It
> actually feels like a speed/stall problem but it really is hard to say.

Max's work is in 0.10.x so the problem is not there.

Cheers,
Pantelis