From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKgL5-0007EI-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:11:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKgL1-0005zw-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:10:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKgL0-0005dQ-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:10:55 -0500 References: <20181026123358.2554-1-ppandit@redhat.com> From: Laurent Vivier Message-ID: <12cdcb7d-9566-4eb6-52b3-94dc97ea408c@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:10:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181026123358.2554-1-ppandit@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] ppc/pnv: check size before data buffer access List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: P J P , Qemu Developers Cc: Prasad J Pandit , Alexander Graf , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Moguofang , David Gibson On 26/10/2018 14:33, P J P wrote: > From: Prasad J Pandit > > While performing PowerNV memory r/w operations, the access length > 'sz' could exceed the data[4] buffer size. Add check to avoid OOB > access. > > Reported-by: Moguofang > Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit > --- > hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Update v2: add error log message > -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg05750.html > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c > index d7721320a2..172a915cfc 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c > @@ -155,9 +155,15 @@ static void pnv_lpc_do_eccb(PnvLpcController *lpc, uint64_t cmd) > /* XXX Check for magic bits at the top, addr size etc... */ > unsigned int sz = (cmd & ECCB_CTL_SZ_MASK) >> ECCB_CTL_SZ_LSH; > uint32_t opb_addr = cmd & ECCB_CTL_ADDR_MASK; > - uint8_t data[4]; > + uint8_t data[8]; > bool success; I'm not sure 8 is enough. ECCB_CTL_SZ_MASK is PPC_BITMASK(4, 7), and ECCB_CTL_SZ_LSH is (63 - 7). So the bitmask is 4 bits wide, and thus sz can be 0 to 15. I think data[] size should be 16. Thanks, Laurent