* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm
@ 2011-03-17 22:42 Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities Glauber Costa
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glauber Costa @ 2011-03-17 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, avi
This patch is a follow up to an earlier one that aims to enable
kvmclock newer msr set. This time I'm doing it through a more sane
mechanism of consulting the kernel about the supported msr set.
Glauber Costa (3):
use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up
with new capabilities
add kvmclock to its second bit
don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.
hw/kvmclock.c | 6 +++-
target-i386/cpuid.c | 3 +-
target-i386/kvm.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities
2011-03-17 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-17 22:42 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-24 10:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add kvmclock to its second bit Glauber Costa
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glauber Costa @ 2011-03-17 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, avi
According to Avi's comments over my last submission, I decided to take a
different, and more correct direction - we hope.
This patch is now using the features provided by KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID directly to
mask out features from guest-visible cpuid.
The old get_para_features() mechanism is kept for older kernels that do not implement it.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
---
target-i386/kvm.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index da757fa..dc1e547 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -95,6 +95,35 @@ static struct kvm_cpuid2 *try_get_cpuid(KVMState *s, int max)
return cpuid;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PARA
+struct kvm_para_features {
+ int cap;
+ int feature;
+} para_features[] = {
+ { KVM_CAP_CLOCKSOURCE, KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE },
+ { KVM_CAP_NOP_IO_DELAY, KVM_FEATURE_NOP_IO_DELAY },
+ { KVM_CAP_PV_MMU, KVM_FEATURE_MMU_OP },
+#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
+ { KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF },
+#endif
+ { -1, -1 }
+};
+
+static int get_para_features(CPUState *env)
+{
+ int i, features = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(para_features) - 1; i++) {
+ if (kvm_check_extension(env->kvm_state, para_features[i].cap)) {
+ features |= (1 << para_features[i].feature);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return features;
+}
+#endif
+
+
uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(CPUState *env, uint32_t function,
uint32_t index, int reg)
{
@@ -102,6 +131,7 @@ uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(CPUState *env, uint32_t function,
int i, max;
uint32_t ret = 0;
uint32_t cpuid_1_edx;
+ int has_kvm_features = 0;
max = 1;
while ((cpuid = try_get_cpuid(env->kvm_state, max)) == NULL) {
@@ -111,6 +141,9 @@ uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(CPUState *env, uint32_t function,
for (i = 0; i < cpuid->nent; ++i) {
if (cpuid->entries[i].function == function &&
cpuid->entries[i].index == index) {
+ if (cpuid->entries[i].function == KVM_CPUID_FEATURES) {
+ has_kvm_features = 1;
+ }
switch (reg) {
case R_EAX:
ret = cpuid->entries[i].eax;
@@ -141,41 +174,16 @@ uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(CPUState *env, uint32_t function,
}
}
+ /* fallback for older kernels */
+ if (!has_kvm_features && (function == KVM_CPUID_FEATURES)) {
+ ret = get_para_features(env);
+ }
+
qemu_free(cpuid);
return ret;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PARA
-struct kvm_para_features {
- int cap;
- int feature;
-} para_features[] = {
- { KVM_CAP_CLOCKSOURCE, KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE },
- { KVM_CAP_NOP_IO_DELAY, KVM_FEATURE_NOP_IO_DELAY },
- { KVM_CAP_PV_MMU, KVM_FEATURE_MMU_OP },
-#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
- { KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF },
-#endif
- { -1, -1 }
-};
-
-static int get_para_features(CPUState *env)
-{
- int i, features = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(para_features) - 1; i++) {
- if (kvm_check_extension(env->kvm_state, para_features[i].cap)) {
- features |= (1 << para_features[i].feature);
- }
- }
-#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
- has_msr_async_pf_en = features & (1 << KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF);
-#endif
- return features;
-}
-#endif
-
#ifdef KVM_CAP_MCE
static int kvm_get_mce_cap_supported(KVMState *s, uint64_t *mce_cap,
int *max_banks)
@@ -363,7 +371,13 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
c->function = KVM_CPUID_FEATURES;
- c->eax = env->cpuid_kvm_features & get_para_features(env);
+ c->eax = env->cpuid_kvm_features & kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(env,
+ KVM_CPUID_FEATURES, 0, R_EAX);
+
+#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
+ has_msr_async_pf_en = c->eax & (1 << KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF);
+#endif
+
#endif
cpu_x86_cpuid(env, 0, 0, &limit, &unused, &unused, &unused);
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add kvmclock to its second bit
2011-03-17 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-17 22:42 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present Glauber Costa
2011-03-24 10:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Avi Kivity
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glauber Costa @ 2011-03-17 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, avi
We have two bits that can represent kvmclock in cpuid.
They signal the guest which msr set to use. When we tweak flags
involving this value - specially when we use "-", we have to act on both.
Besides adding it to the kvm features list, we also have to "break" the
assumption represented by the break in lookup_feature.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
---
target-i386/cpuid.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpuid.c b/target-i386/cpuid.c
index d28de20..48f9bbd 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpuid.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpuid.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static const char *ext3_feature_name[] = {
};
static const char *kvm_feature_name[] = {
- "kvmclock", "kvm_nopiodelay", "kvm_mmu", NULL, "kvm_asyncpf", NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ "kvmclock", "kvm_nopiodelay", "kvm_mmu", "kvmclock", "kvm_asyncpf", NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ static int lookup_feature(uint32_t *pval, const char *s, const char *e,
for (mask = 1, ppc = featureset; mask; mask <<= 1, ++ppc)
if (*ppc && !altcmp(s, e, *ppc)) {
*pval |= mask;
- break;
}
return (mask ? 1 : 0);
}
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.
2011-03-17 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add kvmclock to its second bit Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-17 22:42 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-18 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-03-24 10:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Avi Kivity
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glauber Costa @ 2011-03-17 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, avi
kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
device creation, we have to test for both.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
---
hw/kvmclock.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
--- a/hw/kvmclock.c
+++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
@@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
void kvmclock_create(void)
{
if (kvm_enabled() &&
- first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
+ first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
+#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
+ || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
+#endif
+ )) {
sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
}
}
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-18 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-03-18 14:29 ` Glauber Costa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2011-03-18 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glauber Costa; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, kvm, avi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]
On 2011-03-17 23:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
> device creation, we have to test for both.
Patch is OK, but the subject's logic is inverted.
Jan
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/kvmclock.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
> index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
> --- a/hw/kvmclock.c
> +++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
> void kvmclock_create(void)
> {
> if (kvm_enabled() &&
> - first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
> + first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
> +#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
> + || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
> +#endif
> + )) {
> sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
> }
> }
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.
2011-03-18 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
@ 2011-03-18 14:29 ` Glauber Costa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glauber Costa @ 2011-03-18 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, kvm, avi
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:24 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-17 23:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
> > device creation, we have to test for both.
> Patch is OK, but the subject's logic is inverted.
Indeed, should have said something like "to test for either of them"
Dear maintainers, is it okay to commit with a minor edit to the
changelogs?
> Jan
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/kvmclock.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
> > index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
> > --- a/hw/kvmclock.c
> > +++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
> > void kvmclock_create(void)
> > {
> > if (kvm_enabled() &&
> > - first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
> > + first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
> > +#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
> > + || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
> > +#endif
> > + )) {
> > sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
> > }
> > }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-24 10:27 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2011-03-24 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glauber Costa; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, kvm
On 03/18/2011 12:42 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> According to Avi's comments over my last submission, I decided to take a
> different, and more correct direction - we hope.
>
> This patch is now using the features provided by KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID directly to
> mask out features from guest-visible cpuid.
>
> The old get_para_features() mechanism is kept for older kernels that do not implement it.
>
>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PARA
> +struct kvm_para_features {
> + int cap;
> + int feature;
> +} para_features[] = {
> + { KVM_CAP_CLOCKSOURCE, KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE },
> + { KVM_CAP_NOP_IO_DELAY, KVM_FEATURE_NOP_IO_DELAY },
> + { KVM_CAP_PV_MMU, KVM_FEATURE_MMU_OP },
> +#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
> + { KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF },
> +#endif
Shouldn't the others get the same #ifdef treatment?
Yes, we depend on a kernels of a certain age, but let's not add more
dependencies.
> + { -1, -1 }
> +};
Since you use ARRAY_SIZE() later, don't need the guard here.
> +
> +static int get_para_features(CPUState *env)
> +{
> + int i, features = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i< ARRAY_SIZE(para_features) - 1; i++) {
So you can drop the - 1.
> + if (kvm_check_extension(env->kvm_state, para_features[i].cap)) {
> + features |= (1<< para_features[i].feature);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return features;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +
> uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(CPUState *env, uint32_t function,
> uint32_t index, int reg)
> {
>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PARA
> -struct kvm_para_features {
> - int cap;
> - int feature;
> -} para_features[] = {
> - { KVM_CAP_CLOCKSOURCE, KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE },
> - { KVM_CAP_NOP_IO_DELAY, KVM_FEATURE_NOP_IO_DELAY },
> - { KVM_CAP_PV_MMU, KVM_FEATURE_MMU_OP },
> -#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
> - { KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF },
> -#endif
> - { -1, -1 }
> -};
> -
> -static int get_para_features(CPUState *env)
> -{
> - int i, features = 0;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i< ARRAY_SIZE(para_features) - 1; i++) {
> - if (kvm_check_extension(env->kvm_state, para_features[i].cap)) {
> - features |= (1<< para_features[i].feature);
> - }
> - }
> -#ifdef KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF
> - has_msr_async_pf_en = features& (1<< KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF);
> -#endif
> - return features;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
Oh. The whole thing was copied wholesale. Nevermind.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm
2011-03-17 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Glauber Costa
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present Glauber Costa
@ 2011-03-24 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-24 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2011-03-24 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glauber Costa; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, kvm
On 03/18/2011 12:42 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch is a follow up to an earlier one that aims to enable
> kvmclock newer msr set. This time I'm doing it through a more sane
> mechanism of consulting the kernel about the supported msr set.
Thanks, applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm
2011-03-24 10:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Avi Kivity
@ 2011-03-24 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2011-03-24 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glauber Costa; +Cc: mtosatti, qemu-devel, kvm
On 03/24/2011 12:37 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 12:42 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This patch is a follow up to an earlier one that aims to enable
>> kvmclock newer msr set. This time I'm doing it through a more sane
>> mechanism of consulting the kernel about the supported msr set.
>
> Thanks, applied.
>
(to uq/master)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-24 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-17 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] use kernel-provided para_features instead of statically coming up with new capabilities Glauber Costa
2011-03-24 10:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] add kvmclock to its second bit Glauber Costa
2011-03-17 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present Glauber Costa
2011-03-18 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-03-18 14:29 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-24 10:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable newer msr set for kvm Avi Kivity
2011-03-24 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).