[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.

[Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:24 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-17 23:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
> > device creation, we have to test for both.

> Patch is OK, but the subject's logic is inverted.
Indeed, should have said something like "to test for either of them"

Dear maintainers, is it okay to commit with a minor edit to the
changelogs?

> Jan
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/kvmclock.c |    6 +++++-
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
> > index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
> > --- a/hw/kvmclock.c
> > +++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
> > @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
> >  void kvmclock_create(void)
> >  {
> >      if (kvm_enabled() &&
> > -        first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
> > +        first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
> > +#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
> > +        || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
> > +#endif
> > +    )) {
> >          sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
> >      }
> >  }
>