From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: guard against negative vq notifies
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 22:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304890147-26679-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
The virtio_queue_notify() function checks that the virtqueue number is
less than the maximum number of virtqueues. A signed comparison is used
but the virtqueue number could be negative if a buggy or malicious guest
is run. This results in memory accesses outside of the virtqueue array.
It is risky doing input validation in common code instead of at the
guest<->host boundary. Note that virtio_queue_set_addr(),
virtio_queue_get_addr(), virtio_queue_get_num(), and many other virtio
functions do *not* validate the virtqueue number argument.
Instead of fixing the comparison in virtio_queue_notify(), move the
comparison to the virtio bindings (just like VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_SEL) where
we have a uint32_t value and can avoid ever calling into common virtio
code if the virtqueue number is invalid.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
hw/syborg_virtio.c | 4 +++-
hw/virtio-pci.c | 4 +++-
hw/virtio.c | 4 +---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/syborg_virtio.c b/hw/syborg_virtio.c
index 2f3e6da..00c7be8 100644
--- a/hw/syborg_virtio.c
+++ b/hw/syborg_virtio.c
@@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ static void syborg_virtio_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t offset,
vdev->queue_sel = value;
break;
case SYBORG_VIRTIO_QUEUE_NOTIFY:
- virtio_queue_notify(vdev, value);
+ if (value < VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_MAX) {
+ virtio_queue_notify(vdev, value);
+ }
break;
case SYBORG_VIRTIO_STATUS:
virtio_set_status(vdev, value & 0xFF);
diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
index c19629d..6862aa7 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
@@ -348,7 +348,9 @@ static void virtio_ioport_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
vdev->queue_sel = val;
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NOTIFY:
- virtio_queue_notify(vdev, val);
+ if (val < VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_MAX) {
+ virtio_queue_notify(vdev, val);
+ }
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_STATUS:
if (!(val & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) {
diff --git a/hw/virtio.c b/hw/virtio.c
index 6e8814c..a651860 100644
--- a/hw/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio.c
@@ -585,9 +585,7 @@ void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
{
- if (n < VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_MAX) {
- virtio_queue_notify_vq(&vdev->vq[n]);
- }
+ virtio_queue_notify_vq(&vdev->vq[n]);
}
uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
--
1.7.4.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-08 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-08 21:29 Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2011-05-09 13:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: guard against negative vq notifies Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-05-19 14:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304890147-26679-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).