qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out
@ 2011-07-04 15:39 Kevin Wolf
  2011-07-04 15:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ide: Initialise buffers with zeros Kevin Wolf
  2011-07-05  7:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Markus Armbruster
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2011-07-04 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf

This fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/786209:

    When the DRQ_STAT bit is set, the IDE core permits both data reads
    and data writes, regardless of whether the current transfer was
    initiated as a read or write.

    This potentially leaks uninitialized host memory into the guest,
    if, before doing anything else to an IDE device, the guest begins a
    write transaction (e.g. WIN_WRITE), but then *reads* from the IO
    port instead of writing to it.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
 hw/ide/core.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index ca17a43..2c5395b 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const int smart_attributes[][12] = {
 };
 
 static int ide_handle_rw_error(IDEState *s, int error, int op);
+static void ide_dummy_transfer_stop(IDEState *s);
 
 static void padstr(char *str, const char *src, int len)
 {
@@ -1532,15 +1533,32 @@ void ide_cmd_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
     bus->cmd = val;
 }
 
+static bool ide_is_pio_out(IDEState *s)
+{
+    if (s->end_transfer_func == ide_sector_write ||
+        s->end_transfer_func == ide_atapi_cmd) {
+        return false;
+    } else if (s->end_transfer_func == ide_sector_read ||
+               s->end_transfer_func == ide_transfer_stop ||
+               s->end_transfer_func == ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end ||
+               s->end_transfer_func == ide_dummy_transfer_stop) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    abort();
+}
+
 void ide_data_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
 {
     IDEBus *bus = opaque;
     IDEState *s = idebus_active_if(bus);
     uint8_t *p;
 
-    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set */
-    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT))
+    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set. The result of a write
+     * during PIO out is indeterminate, just ignore it. */
+    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT) || ide_is_pio_out(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
     p = s->data_ptr;
     *(uint16_t *)p = le16_to_cpu(val);
@@ -1557,9 +1575,11 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readw(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
     uint8_t *p;
     int ret;
 
-    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set */
-    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT))
+    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set. The result of a read
+     * during PIO in is indeterminate, return 0 and don't move forward. */
+    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT) || !ide_is_pio_out(s)) {
         return 0;
+    }
 
     p = s->data_ptr;
     ret = cpu_to_le16(*(uint16_t *)p);
@@ -1576,9 +1596,11 @@ void ide_data_writel(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
     IDEState *s = idebus_active_if(bus);
     uint8_t *p;
 
-    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set */
-    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT))
+    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set. The result of a write
+     * during PIO out is indeterminate, just ignore it. */
+    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT) || ide_is_pio_out(s)) {
         return;
+    }
 
     p = s->data_ptr;
     *(uint32_t *)p = le32_to_cpu(val);
@@ -1595,9 +1617,11 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
     uint8_t *p;
     int ret;
 
-    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set */
-    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT))
+    /* PIO data access allowed only when DRQ bit is set. The result of a read
+     * during PIO in is indeterminate, return 0 and don't move forward. */
+    if (!(s->status & DRQ_STAT) || !ide_is_pio_out(s)) {
         return 0;
+    }
 
     p = s->data_ptr;
     ret = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)p);
-- 
1.7.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ide: Initialise buffers with zeros
  2011-07-04 15:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Kevin Wolf
@ 2011-07-04 15:39 ` Kevin Wolf
  2011-07-05  7:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Markus Armbruster
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2011-07-04 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf

Just in case there's still a way how a guest can read out buffers when it's not
supposed to, let's zero the buffers during initialisation so that we don't leak
information to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
 hw/ide/core.c |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index 2c5395b..9cace01 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -1785,9 +1785,13 @@ static void ide_init1(IDEBus *bus, int unit)
     s->unit = unit;
     s->drive_serial = drive_serial++;
     /* we need at least 2k alignment for accessing CDROMs using O_DIRECT */
-    s->io_buffer = qemu_memalign(2048, IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS*512 + 4);
     s->io_buffer_total_len = IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS*512 + 4;
+    s->io_buffer = qemu_memalign(2048, s->io_buffer_total_len);
+    memset(s->io_buffer, 0, s->io_buffer_total_len);
+
     s->smart_selftest_data = qemu_blockalign(s->bs, 512);
+    memset(s->smart_selftest_data, 0, 512);
+
     s->sector_write_timer = qemu_new_timer_ns(vm_clock,
                                            ide_sector_write_timer_cb, s);
 }
-- 
1.7.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out
  2011-07-04 15:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Kevin Wolf
  2011-07-04 15:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ide: Initialise buffers with zeros Kevin Wolf
@ 2011-07-05  7:39 ` Markus Armbruster
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2011-07-05  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Wolf; +Cc: qemu-devel

I got confused by "PIO out" until it dawned on me that it's from the
device's point of view, i.e. out means device -> cpu, not the CPU's out
instruction.

Both patches

Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-05  7:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-04 15:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Kevin Wolf
2011-07-04 15:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ide: Initialise buffers with zeros Kevin Wolf
2011-07-05  7:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ide: Ignore reads during PIO in and writes during PIO out Markus Armbruster

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).