From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qij5i-0000dc-GG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:22:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qij5g-0002VZ-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:22:14 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49979 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qij5f-0002Ux-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:22:11 -0400 From: Alexander Graf Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:57:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1310864241-27912-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] S390 virtio hotplug v3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com Hey guys, this patch set adds support for hotplug add on S390. Apparently it's the first non-x86 platform receiving so much love in Qemu, so I've stumbled over some very basic #if defined(TARGET_I386) cases that just shouldn't be there. It's trying to make things as generic as possible. I've talked to Markus about this vs blockdev and he's fine with pulling in a "dirty" solution in case the right one takes too long. But we haven't decided on which one is more clean :). Alex Alexander Graf (4): [S390] Add hotplug support Compile device-hotplug on all targets Add generic drive hotplugging Expose drive_add on all architectures Makefile.target | 5 ++++- hmp-commands.hx | 2 -- hw/device-hotplug.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/pci-hotplug.c | 24 ++++-------------------- hw/s390-virtio-bus.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- hw/s390-virtio-bus.h | 5 +++++ sysemu.h | 6 +++++- 7 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)