From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjS3H-0002xF-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:22:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjS3C-0000b6-Vo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:22:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjS3C-0000ay-Cg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:22:38 -0400 From: Mark McLoughlin In-Reply-To: <20110720081859.GD8667@redhat.com> References: <1308242737-15449-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20110719121011.GA6142@redhat.com> <4E25C467.8090900@siemens.com> <20110720081859.GD8667@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:22:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1311150154.2648.10.camel@sorcha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] netdev fixes Reply-To: Mark McLoughlin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jan Kiszka , aliguori@us.ibm.com, Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 11:19 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 07:52:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2011-07-19 14:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:45:35PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > >> Markus Armbruster (2): > > >> Fix automatically assigned network names for netdev > > >> Fix netdev name lookup in -device, device_add, netdev_del > > >> > > >> net.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- > > >> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > Thanks, applied. > > > I think going forward we should bring more order into ways we assign > > > IDs. > > > > Did you take over net subsystem integration? > > No, Markus just asked me to look at his patches, and I took interest. > I applied the patches to my tree, from there pull requests go to Anthony > who is a maintainer for net/ so I think that's all right. > > Also, it's just my tree, pull request won't go out before > Thursday at the earliest, so if someone objects > (or wants to merge them himself), there's plenty of time. > > > Or who should initially receive related patches now? > > > > Jan > > I think running ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is generally > a good idea. For net you'd get: > > [qemu]$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f net.c net/ > Anthony Liguori (maintainer:Network device layer,commit_signer:4/16=25%) > Mark McLoughlin (maintainer:Network device layer) This is clearly out of date - feel free to remove it Cheers, Mark.