From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkinE-00054u-Ve for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:27:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkinC-0000A5-KR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:27:24 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46743 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkinC-00009g-FK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:27:22 -0400 From: Alexander Graf Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:43:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1311338620-26932-4-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1311338620-26932-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> References: <1311338620-26932-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] exec.c: Use ram_addr_t in cpu_physical_memory_rw(...). List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: QEMU-devel Developers Cc: Anthony PERARD , Anthony Liguori From: Anthony PERARD As the variable pd and addr1 inside the function cpu_physical_memory_rw are mean to handle a RAM address, they should be of the ram_addr_t type instead of unsigned long. Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf --- exec.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c index 2160ded..0393d39 100644 --- a/exec.c +++ b/exec.c @@ -3858,7 +3858,7 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t addr, uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *ptr; uint32_t val; target_phys_addr_t page; - unsigned long pd; + ram_addr_t pd; PhysPageDesc *p; while (len > 0) { @@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t addr, uint8_t *buf, l = 1; } } else { - unsigned long addr1; + ram_addr_t addr1; addr1 = (pd & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK); /* RAM case */ ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(addr1); -- 1.6.0.2