From: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
To: kwolf@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC][0/2] REF+/REF- optimization
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:53:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315900388-6448-1-git-send-email-freddy77@gmail.com> (raw)
These patches try to trade-off between leaks and speed for clusters
refcounts.
Refcount increments (REF+ or refp) are handled in a different way from
decrements (REF- or refm). The reason it that posting or not flushing
a REF- cause "just" a leak while posting a REF+ cause a corruption.
To optimize REF- I just used an array to store offsets then when a
flush is requested or array reach a limit (currently 1022) the array
is sorted and written to disk. I use an array with offset instead of
ranges to support compression (an offset could appear multiple times
in the array).
I consider this patch quite ready.
To optimize REF+ I mark a range as allocated and use this range to
get new ones (avoiding writing refcount to disk). When a flush is
requested or in some situations (like snapshot) this cache is disabled
and flushed (written as REF-).
I do not consider this patch ready, it works and pass all io-tests
but for instance I would avoid allocating new clusters for refcount
during preallocation.
End speed up is quite visible allocating clusters (more then 20%).
Frediano Ziglio (2):
qcow2: optimize refminus updates
qcow2: ref+ optimization
block/qcow2-refcount.c | 270 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
block/qcow2.c | 2 +
block/qcow2.h | 16 +++
3 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-13 7:53 Frediano Ziglio [this message]
2011-09-13 7:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC][1/2] qcow2: optimize refminus updates Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-13 7:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC][2/2] qcow2: ref+ optimization Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-13 10:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC][0/2] REF+/REF- optimization Kevin Wolf
2011-09-13 13:36 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-14 9:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-09-14 9:52 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-14 10:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-09-14 11:49 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-15 7:24 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-09-13 14:55 ` Frediano Ziglio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315900388-6448-1-git-send-email-freddy77@gmail.com \
--to=freddy77@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).