From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50010)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dgibson@ozlabs.org>) id 1SFIMV-0002Yb-R5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:02:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dgibson@ozlabs.org>) id 1SFIMU-0005T2-97
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:02:27 -0400
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date: Wed,  4 Apr 2012 15:02:04 +1000
Message-Id: <1333515728-9769-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [0/4] Assorted ppc/pseries cleanups
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: afaerber@web.de
Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andreas,

Here's another batch of pseries patches.  1-3 are cleanups with little
to no functionality change.  4 implements automatic address allocation
for VIO devices, which makes instantiating them with -device rather
easier.

This is about the third small series of patches I have pending for ppc
inclusion.  Would you prefer me to keep sending them this way, or
should I be sending consolidated series with all my pending patches,
even if they've been sent before?