From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33303)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1Sev50-0004pW-0J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:26:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1Sev4y-0006Nt-9s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:26:17 -0400
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:56663)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1Sev4x-0006NK-Fk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0400
Message-ID: <1339622721.9220.118.camel@pasglop>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:25:21 +1000
In-Reply-To: <4FD8FECB.4070503@codemonkey.ws>
References: <CAEgOgz5RadrsLQ9fniu40t4TwK-ubMcJOjhcVP9HVyHLBXH=+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FD208F6.3020307@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAEgOgz7bcfoA5DYM8T0Jz4OVOJkj3j85wjph825FXwL-QGY79w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FD5EF75.7060707@us.ibm.com>
	<CAFEAcA9aLUgMD-QtSr3uWtJPWA7Oj0BYTf67TdhGxN0_fnEicQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FD60834.2020208@codemonkey.ws> <4FD62B5C.4040106@redhat.com>
	<4FD63A7F.8090902@codemonkey.ws> <1339452058.9220.32.camel@pasglop>
	<4FD67132.1060001@codemonkey.ws> <4FD7100F.3080207@redhat.com>
	<1339547861.9220.77.camel@pasglop> <4FD8FECB.4070503@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QOMification of AXI streams
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:57 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> I think pci_* wrappers is the right thing to do in the short term (and probably 
> long term too).

Oh I agree absolutely. Same for vio, I'll do some wrappers. One
remaining question is where do the barriers go in that scheme...

I'll figure something out for now, again, goal is purely to have a
stable device interface, we can rip the guts of the implementation out
for something better. I'll try to spend time on that today (it's HARD to
work while looking after a sick 3 yrs old :-)

Cheers,
Ben.