From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHvDT-00038h-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:50:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHvDQ-0002Rg-Na for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:50:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHvDQ-0002QV-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 12:50:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:50:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1341142740.5922306.1496681450441.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1496320911-51305-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1496320911-51305-18-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 17/33] vhost-user-scsi: Introduce vhost-user-scsi host device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Felipe Franciosi , qemu-devel ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Blake" > To: "Felipe Franciosi" > Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" , "qemu-devel" > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 6:41:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 17/33] vhost-user-scsi: Introduce vhost-user-scsi host device > > On 06/05/2017 11:38 AM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > > >>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi > >>> Message-Id: <1488479153-21203-4-git-send-email-felipe@nutanix.com> > >>> --- > >> > >> This pull request still hasn't landed, and now it needs a rebase: > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > Thanks for the report. Looks simple. Part of the series have been merged. > > Should I rebase+resend just the two missing patches (as a new series?) or > > should Paolo do this? I'm not sure what's the workflow here. > > Paolo has to re-spin his PULL request, but I'm sure it would help him to > have updated patches from you that work out of the box, instead of > making him figure out the changes that have to be made. I have to retest everything anyway. But it'll have to wait for tomorrow or later, because I have other stuff to do. Paolo