qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Bill Gray <bgray@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2)
Date: Mon,  2 Jul 2012 15:06:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341252398-12268-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> (raw)

Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has any
feedback about this proposal?

Changes v1 -> v2:
 - Coding style fixes

Original cover letter:

I was investigating if there are any mechanisms that allow manually pinning of
guest RAM to specific host NUMA nodes, in the case of multi-node KVM guests, and
noticed that -mem-path could be used for that, except that it currently removes
any files it creates (using mkstemp()) immediately, not allowing numactl to be
used on the backing files, as a result. This patches add a -keep-mem-path-files
option to make QEMU create the files inside -mem-path with more predictable
names, and not remove them after creation.

Some previous discussions about the subject, for reference:
 - Message-ID: <1281534738-8310-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com>
   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/57684
 - Message-ID: <4C7D7C2A.7000205@codemonkey.ws>
   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/58835

A more recent thread can be found at:
 - Message-ID: <20111029184502.GH11038@in.ibm.com>
   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/123001

Note that this is just a mechanism to facilitate manual static binding using
numactl on hugetlbfs later, for optimization. This may be especially useful for
single large multi-node guests use-cases (and, of course, has to be used with
care).

I don't know if it is a good idea to use the memory range names as a publicly-
visible interface. Another option may be to use a single file instead, and mmap
different regions inside the same file for each memory region. I an open to
comments and suggestions.

Example (untested) usage to bind manually each half of the RAM of a guest to a
different NUMA node:

 $ qemu-system-x86_64 [...] -m 2048 -smp 4 \
   -numa node,cpus=0-1,mem=1024 -numa node,cpus=2-3,mem=1024 \
   -mem-prealloc -keep-mem-path-files -mem-path /mnt/hugetlbfs/FOO
 $ numactl --offset=1G --length=1G --membind=1 --file /mnt/hugetlbfs/FOO/pc.ram
 $ numactl --offset=0  --length=1G --membind=2 --file /mnt/hugetlbfs/FOO/pc.ram


Eduardo Habkost (6):
  file_ram_alloc(): coding style fixes
  file_ram_alloc(): use g_strdup_printf() instead of asprintf()
  vl.c: change mem_prealloc to bool (v2)
  file_ram_alloc: change length argument to size_t (v2)
  file_ram_alloc(): extract temporary-file creation code to separate
    function (v2)
  add -keep-mem-path-files option (v2)

 cpu-all.h       |    3 ++-
 exec.c          |   68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 qemu-options.hx |   12 ++++++++++
 vl.c            |    9 ++++++--
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4

             reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-02 18:06 Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] file_ram_alloc(): coding style fixes Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-03 19:16   ` Blue Swirl
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] file_ram_alloc(): use g_strdup_printf() instead of asprintf() Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-03 19:16   ` Blue Swirl
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] vl.c: change mem_prealloc to bool (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] file_ram_alloc: change length argument to size_t (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] file_ram_alloc(): extract temporary-file creation code to separate function (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-02 18:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 6/6] add -keep-mem-path-files option (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-02 18:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2) Daniel P. Berrange
2012-07-02 19:54   ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-07-03  9:03     ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341252398-12268-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=bgray@redhat.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).