* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI improved LBA-out-of-range checks
@ 2012-07-12 6:52 Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify Ronnie Sahlberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2012-07-12 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pbonzini, qemu-devel
Paolo, List
Please find a small patch to the scsi emulation.
This patch improves the checkign that the requested lbas are all available.
We check both that lba+len is not going past the end of the device
but also if lba+len < lba
This second condition could occur for deviously crafted scsi packets where
lba is set to 0xffffffffffffffff and len is set to 2
in which case lba+len would wrap to 1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify
2012-07-12 6:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI improved LBA-out-of-range checks Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2012-07-12 6:52 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2012-07-12 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pbonzini, qemu-devel; +Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg
Improve the tests for the LBA to cover more cases, the new test looks like this
if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
|| r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
For the 16 byte opcodes, the lba is a uint64, so the first check is to make sure that we do not wrap.
For example if an opcode would specify the LBA:0xffffffffffffffff and LEN:2
then lba+len would wrap to 1.
The second part of the test is to verify that ALL requested blocks are available, not just the first one.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
---
hw/scsi-disk.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
index b2f3c0c..40c05de 100644
--- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
+++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
@@ -1558,7 +1558,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
goto fail;
}
- if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
+ if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
+ || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
goto illegal_lba;
}
r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
@@ -1581,7 +1582,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
goto fail;
}
- if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
+ if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
+ || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
goto illegal_lba;
}
r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
--
1.7.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify
2012-07-12 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2012-07-12 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-12 7:06 ` ronnie sahlberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2012-07-12 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: qemu-devel
Il 12/07/2012 08:52, Ronnie Sahlberg ha scritto:
> Improve the tests for the LBA to cover more cases, the new test looks like this
> if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
> || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>
> For the 16 byte opcodes, the lba is a uint64, so the first check is to make sure that we do not wrap.
> For example if an opcode would specify the LBA:0xffffffffffffffff and LEN:2
> then lba+len would wrap to 1.
>
> The second part of the test is to verify that ALL requested blocks are available, not just the first one.
Fixed code style for || and applied to scsi-next.
Thanks!
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/scsi-disk.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> index b2f3c0c..40c05de 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
> goto fail;
> }
> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
> goto illegal_lba;
> }
> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
> @@ -1581,7 +1582,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
> goto fail;
> }
> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
> goto illegal_lba;
> }
> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify
2012-07-12 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2012-07-12 7:06 ` ronnie sahlberg
2012-07-12 7:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: ronnie sahlberg @ 2012-07-12 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: qemu-devel
Sorry, there is a bug in it.
Can you change it to :
|| r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba + 1) {
or else the last lba of the device will be flagged as out of range.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 12/07/2012 08:52, Ronnie Sahlberg ha scritto:
>> Improve the tests for the LBA to cover more cases, the new test looks like this
>> if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>>
>> For the 16 byte opcodes, the lba is a uint64, so the first check is to make sure that we do not wrap.
>> For example if an opcode would specify the LBA:0xffffffffffffffff and LEN:2
>> then lba+len would wrap to 1.
>>
>> The second part of the test is to verify that ALL requested blocks are available, not just the first one.
>
> Fixed code style for || and applied to scsi-next.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/scsi-disk.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> index b2f3c0c..40c05de 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
>> @@ -1558,7 +1558,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>> @@ -1581,7 +1582,8 @@ static int32_t scsi_send_command(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *buf)
>> if (r->req.cmd.buf[1] & 0xe0) {
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - if (r->req.cmd.lba > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> + if (r->req.cmd.lba > r->req.cmd.lba + len
>> + || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba) {
>> goto illegal_lba;
>> }
>> r->sector = r->req.cmd.lba * (s->qdev.blocksize / 512);
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify
2012-07-12 7:06 ` ronnie sahlberg
@ 2012-07-12 7:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2012-07-12 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ronnie sahlberg; +Cc: qemu-devel
Il 12/07/2012 09:06, ronnie sahlberg ha scritto:
> Sorry, there is a bug in it.
>
> Can you change it to :
> || r->req.cmd.lba + len > s->qdev.max_lba + 1) {
>
> or else the last lba of the device will be flagged as out of range.
Yes, done that already. Can you add a test for the last LBA to your
testsuite?
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-12 7:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-12 6:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI improved LBA-out-of-range checks Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI: improve the lba-out-of-range tests for read/write/verify Ronnie Sahlberg
2012-07-12 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-12 7:06 ` ronnie sahlberg
2012-07-12 7:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).