From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqmPC-0001t3-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:36:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqmP6-0006bi-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:36:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqmP6-0006ba-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:36:04 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6GEa3xF003144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:36:03 -0400 From: Kevin Wolf Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:35:58 +0200 Message-Id: <1342449360-15227-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] More RELATIVE SEEK fun List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: phrdina@redhat.com Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Pavel, you said you have a real floppy drive around. Would you mind giving the cases from patch 2 a try on it? The spec wasn't entirely clear to me, so the values in the test case depend more on guessing than on knowledge. I'm pretty sure that qemu is buggy there, though, so if you like to fix first the test according to real hardware and then qemu to pass the test, that would be great. Kevin Kevin Wolf (2): fdc-test: Clean up a bit fdc-test: Check RELATIVE SEEK beyond track 0/80 tests/fdc-test.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 1.7.6.5